[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <474EF3AF.3070201@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:15:27 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
CC: panther@...abit.hu, Lutz Jaenicke <ljaenicke@...ominate.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 iptables]Interface group match
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Nov 29 2007 17:27, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> The syntax "name/0xmask" is simply too strange for me.
>> Then how about name/name with masks also defined in rt_ifgroup?
>> The same question applies for marks of course.
>>
> I would find that confusing, which is why the new xt_TOS only
> allows names when no /mask or a mask of /allbits is used.
Its still useful, you don't have to use it :) Another alternative
would be to allow defining names to val/mask.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists