netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] [IPSEC]: Reinject packet instead of calling netfilter directly on input

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1197162088.5528.12.camel@localhost>
Date:	Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:01:28 -0500
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki /
	 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [IPSEC]: Reinject packet instead of calling
	netfilter directly on input

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 07:34 -0500, jamal wrote:

> The point brought up on v6 extensions needs to be addressed. I thought
> about it a little - and it is valid as well for ipv4 options; they will
> be processed twice.
> To build up on what Patrick said, I noticed a bit still available in the
> bag right after skb->nf_trace that i could use to signal
> "options/extensions already processed". 
> If people think think this is a sane use of that very lonely bit, I will
> post patches.

And the patch included demonstrates the thought (I thought i had sent it
to the list on monday; seems only to Yoshfuji). Note, blah is not a
proper name, just an emphasis.

cheers,
jama

View attachment "v4v6-reinject" of type "text/x-patch" (3658 bytes)