netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9543] New: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (2164)/RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv4/devinet.c (1055)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071211123027.cd4faa19.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:30:27 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>
Cc:	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9543] New: RTNL: assertion failed at
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c (2164)/RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv4/devinet.c
 (1055)

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:04:27 +0100 (CET) Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl> wrote:

> >>  [<783bfa72>] rt_run_flush+0x43/0x8b
> >>  [<783bfa93>] rt_run_flush+0x64/0x8b
> >>  [<7813ac54>] notifier_call_chain+0x2a/0x52
> >>  [<7813ac9e>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x17/0x1a
> >>  [<783a3471>] netdev_state_change+0x18/0x29
> >>  [<783ac6a9>] __linkwatch_run_queue+0x150/0x17e
> >>  [<783ac6f4>] linkwatch_event+0x1d/0x22
> >>  [<78133cdf>] run_workqueue+0xdb/0x1b6
> >>  [<78133c8b>] run_workqueue+0x87/0x1b6
> >>  [<783ac6d7>] linkwatch_event+0x0/0x22
> >>  [<781346ff>] worker_thread+0x0/0x85
> >>  [<78134778>] worker_thread+0x79/0x85
> >>  [<781371ad>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
> >>  [<781370f6>] kthread+0x38/0x5e
> >>  [<781370be>] kthread+0x0/0x5e
> >>  [<78104baf>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> >>  =======================
> >> RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1610)
> >
> >
> > Hopefully this is due to the bug you reported in bug #9542.
> >
> > Does this patch fix both issues?
> 
> Unfortunately not. I just updated bugzilla.

argh.  Please conduct these discussions via emailed reply-to-all, not via
the bugzilla web interface.

I think my patch _did_ fix http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9542
But then you hit a new bonding locking bug.

Rafael, please track 9542 and 9543 as post-2.6.23 regressions, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html