[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3ve71t194.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:28:07 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HDLC driver: use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice
Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com> writes:
> [PATCH] HDLC driver: use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice
>
> Since the caller and the upper caller doesn't hod the rtnl semaphore.
> We should use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice.
NAK, not-a-bug. The caller actually holds rtnl, it goes through
the netdev core ioctl dispatcher:
(unregister_netdevice+0x0/0x24) from (fr_ioctl+0x688/0x75c)
/* fr_del_pvc() and fr_add_pvc() optimized out by gcc */
(fr_ioctl+0x0/0x75c) from (hdlc_ioctl+0x4c/0x8c)
(hdlc_ioctl+0x0/0x8c) from (hss_ioctl+0x3c/0x324)
(hss_ioctl+0x0/0x324) from (dev_ifsioc+0x428/0x4e8)
(dev_ifsioc+0x0/0x4e8) from (dev_ioctl+0x5d8/0x664)
(dev_ioctl+0x0/0x664) from (sock_ioctl+0x90/0x254)
(sock_ioctl+0x0/0x254) from (do_ioctl+0x34/0x78)
(do_ioctl+0x0/0x78) from (vfs_ioctl+0x78/0x2a8)
(vfs_ioctl+0x0/0x2a8) from (sys_ioctl+0x40/0x64)
(sys_ioctl+0x0/0x64) from (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c)
The patch would make it deadlock.
Please note that sister fr_add_pvc() uses register_netdevice().
The same applies to fr_destroy().
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists