[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071214.133622.51765106.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:36:22 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: khc@...waw.pl
Cc: wangchen@...fujitsu.com, jgarzik@...ox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HDLC driver: use unregister_netdev instead of
unregister_netdevice
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:28:07 +0100
> Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com> writes:
>
> > [PATCH] HDLC driver: use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice
> >
> > Since the caller and the upper caller doesn't hod the rtnl semaphore.
> > We should use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice.
>
> NAK, not-a-bug. The caller actually holds rtnl, it goes through
> the netdev core ioctl dispatcher:
>
> (unregister_netdevice+0x0/0x24) from (fr_ioctl+0x688/0x75c)
> /* fr_del_pvc() and fr_add_pvc() optimized out by gcc */
> (fr_ioctl+0x0/0x75c) from (hdlc_ioctl+0x4c/0x8c)
> (hdlc_ioctl+0x0/0x8c) from (hss_ioctl+0x3c/0x324)
> (hss_ioctl+0x0/0x324) from (dev_ifsioc+0x428/0x4e8)
> (dev_ifsioc+0x0/0x4e8) from (dev_ioctl+0x5d8/0x664)
> (dev_ioctl+0x0/0x664) from (sock_ioctl+0x90/0x254)
> (sock_ioctl+0x0/0x254) from (do_ioctl+0x34/0x78)
> (do_ioctl+0x0/0x78) from (vfs_ioctl+0x78/0x2a8)
> (vfs_ioctl+0x0/0x2a8) from (sys_ioctl+0x40/0x64)
> (sys_ioctl+0x0/0x64) from (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c)
>
> The patch would make it deadlock.
Ok, I'll drop this patch, thanks for checking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists