[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1197846610.7302.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:10:10 -0500
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>
Cc: Masakazu Mokuno <mokuno@...sony.co.jp>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
geoffrey.levand@...sony.com,
Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PS3: gelic: Add wireless support for PS3
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 10:11 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I was going to propose that on Friday but got side-tracked. What
> > would require a new key type? Are there some firmwares that _only_
> > accept the WPA passphrase? Because if there aren't (PS3 accepts WPA hex
> > keys too) then the supplicant could just pass the hex key. Not quite
> > sure what you mean here with "new key type".
>
> It is a new key type regardless of whether it is PSK or passphrase. The
> current key types (IW_AUTH_CIPHER_*) are WEP40, TKIP, CCMP, and WEP104..
Ah, it's a different key because it's not set _during_ the 4-way
handshake, but just sent to the fw directly and the fw handles it,
right?
> I don't know whether there are any Linux drivers that would use WPA
> passphrase, but at least the Mac OS X driver interface seems to only use
> passphrase for WPA-Personal, so it is apparently possible to design such
> a architecture ;-). Anyway, I would be fine with just adding
> IW_AUTH_CIPHER_PMK for now (and the new capability to figure out whether
> this is needed). That PMK would be PSK for WPA-Personal, but it could
> also be used as PMK for WPA-Enterprise, so the more generic PMK name.
Sounds good.
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists