netdev - Re: Inline local_bh_disable when TRACE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071219115019.GA9099@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:50:19 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Inline local_bh_disable when TRACE_IRQFLAGS

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > So I'm wondering if it would be reasonable to make it out-of-line when 
> > TRACE_IRQFLAGS is off.  This may make a difference because the 
> > networking stack is a frequent user of local_bh_disable and 
> > local_bh_enable.
> 
> do you mean to make it inline again?

Yes I meant in-line :)

> (btw., generally i think local_bh_disable() is a poor API because it is 
> opaque about the data structure dependency that it governs. Explicit 
> exclusion rules generally work better.)

I see where you're coming from especially with your preemptible
softirq work.  However I'm mostly thinking about the existing
callers of local_bh_disable in the networking stack.

Thanks,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html