[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1198137604.6484.25.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:00:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@....uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] Swap over NFS -v15
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 17:22 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Another posting of the full swap over NFS series.
> >
> > Andrew/Linus, could we start thinking of sticking this in -mm?
> >
>
> Two questions:
> 1 - what is the memory use impact on the system which don't do swap over
> NFS, such as embedded systems, and
It should have little to no impact if not used.
> 2 - what is the advantage of this code over the two existing network
> swap approaches,
> swapping to NFS mounted file and
This is not actually possible with a recent kernel, current swapfile
support requires a blockdevice.
> swap to NBD device?
> I've used the NFS file when a program was running out of memory and that
> seemed to work, people in UNYUUG have reported that the nbd swap works,
> so what's better here?
swap over NBD works sometimes, its rather easy to deadlock, and its
impossible to recover from a broken connection.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists