[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:09 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: paul.moore@...com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] One more XFRM audit fix
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:29:31 -0500
> The following patch is backed against David's net-2.6 tree and is pretty
> trivial. I know we're late in the 2.6.24 cycle but I think this is worth
> merging, if you guys don't feel that way let me know and I'll resubmit it
> for 2.6.25.
Where is that patch? Or do you mean the fix you emailed
seperately today (which I will apply, thanks)?
> As a side note, I'm unable to actually test the patch because I can't get
> the kernel to compile (M=net/xfrm works just fine). The problem I keep
> seeing is below:
>
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target \
> `/blah/kernels/net-2.6_xfrm-auid-secid-fix/include/linux/ticable.h', \
> needed by \
> `/blah/kernels/net-2.6_xfrm-auid-secid-fix/usr/include/linux/ticable.h'. \
> Stop.
Remove ticable.h from include/linux/Kbuild
This is already cured in Linus's tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists