netdev - Re: TSO trimming question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:36:42 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	billfink@...dspring.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jheffner@....edu
Subject: Re: TSO trimming question

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:29:27 +0800

> On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 01:27:20AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > It's two shifts, and this gets scheduled along with the other
> > instructions on many cpus so it's effectively free.
> > 
> > I don't see why this is even worth mentioning and discussing.
> 
> I totally agree.  Two shifts are way better than a branch.

We take probably a thousand+ 100+ cycle cache misses in the TCP stack
on big window openning ACKs.

Instead of discussing ways to solve that huge performance killer we're
wanking about two friggin' integer shifts.

It's hilarious isn't it? :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html