[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78C9135A3D2ECE4B8162EBDCE82CAD7702CAA9E8@nekter>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:01:32 -0500
From: "Ramkrishna Vepa" <Ramkrishna.Vepa@...erion.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/7]: [NET]: Do not check netif_running() and carrier state in ->poll()
Dave,
Sorry, should have been clearer. When I meant "brought down" did not
mean close, but when a adapter reset is initiated. The napi_disable() is
called only on a close. When the driver does a reset, napi_disable() is
not called.
Ram
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 2:48 PM
> To: Ramkrishna Vepa
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7]: [NET]: Do not check netif_running() and
carrier
> state in ->poll()
>
> From: "Ramkrishna Vepa" <Ramkrishna.Vepa@...erion.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:17:03 -0500
>
> > Dave,
> >
> > This change is not required as the macro, is_s2io_card_up() checks
for
> > an internal state of the adapter and not netif's state. We want to
make
> > sure that the adapter registers are not accessed when the adapter is
> > being brought down.
>
> If the adapter is being brought down, you would have done
> a napi_disable() first and therefore never reach this code
> path.
>
> The removal is correct, I read how your driver works.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists