netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] bonding: 3 fixes for 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801091034390.27051@bizon.gios.gov.pl>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:36:38 +0100 (CET)
From:	Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bonding: 3 fixes for 2.6.24 



On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Jay Vosburgh wrote:

> Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl> wrote:
>
>> Fine. Just let you know that someone test your patches and everything
>> works, except mentioned problem.
>
> 	And I appreciate it; I just wanted to make sure our many fans
> following along at home didn't misunderstand.
>
> 	Could you let me know if the patch below make the lockdep
> warning go away?  This applies on top of the previous three, although it
> should be trivial to do by hand.
>
> 	I'm still checking to make sure this is safe with regard to
> mutexing the bonding structures, but it would be good to know if it
> eliminates the warning.

I can confirm that the warning went away.

Tested-by: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@....pl>

Best regards,

 				Krzysztof Olędzki