[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080109152740.GE8728@gospo.usersys.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:27:40 -0500
From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bonding: 3 fixes for 2.6.24
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:58:34PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl> wrote:
>
> >Fine. Just let you know that someone test your patches and everything
> >works, except mentioned problem.
>
> And I appreciate it; I just wanted to make sure our many fans
> following along at home didn't misunderstand.
>
> Could you let me know if the patch below make the lockdep
> warning go away? This applies on top of the previous three, although it
> should be trivial to do by hand.
>
> I'm still checking to make sure this is safe with regard to
> mutexing the bonding structures, but it would be good to know if it
> eliminates the warning.
>
> -J
>
Jay,
My initial concern was that a slave device could disappear out from
under us, but it seems like this certainly isn't the case since all
calls to bond_release are protected by rtnl-locks, so I think you are
correct that we are safe. I'll test this on my setup here and let you
know if I see any problems.
-andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists