[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23761.1200013613@death>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:06:53 -0800
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bonding: 3 fixes for 2.6.24
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:03:53PM -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>>
>> > >Sure, but where do you call that function while holding the bond lock?
>> >
>> > If I recall correctly, the problem was that tg3, et al, did
>> > things that might sleep, and bonding was calling from a timer context,
>> > which couldn't sleep. It wasn't about the lock.
>>
>> Exactly, I was just about to post the same.
>
>In other words, changing read_lock on bond->lock to read_lock_bh doesn't
>affect this one bit.
For the case of the bond_set_multicast_list function, changing
the existing write_lock to a read_lock_bh doesn't affect any calls to
dev_set_mac_address (since it isn't called from there) and, apparently,
also resolves the lockdep warning. I'm still trying to get lockdep to
generate the warning for me locally; I'm not sure which magic thing I'm
missing.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists