[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18315.19232.437801.553809@robur.slu.se>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:44:32 +0100
From: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, robert.olsson@....uu.se,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen.hemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] get rid of unused revision element
David Miller writes:
> > The revision element must of been part of an earlier design,
> > because currently it is set but never used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>
>
> I suspect Robert wanted to play around with some generation
> ID optimizations but never got around to it.
The idea was to have a selective flush of route cache entries when
a fib insert/delete happened. From what I remember you added another/
better solution. Just a list with route cache entries pointing to parent
route. So yes this was obsoleted by your/our effort to avoid total
flushing of the route cache. Unfinished work.
According to http://bgpupdates.potaroo.net/instability/bgpupd.html
(last in page) we currently flush the route cache 2.80 times per second.
when using full Internet routing with Linux. Maybe we're forced to pick
up this thread again someday.
Cheers.
--ro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists