netdev - Re: Assertions in latest kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OFBB992ED6.6AEB3511-ON652573D9.003AC1C3-652573D9.003A6B6F@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:08:05 +0530
From:	Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Assertions in latest kernels

ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi wrote on 01/23/2008 03:23:24 PM:

> > There were couple of patch apply failures in .c files which I fixed by
> > hand.
> > But when compiling, I got these errors (I am using DM's 2.6.24-rc7
kernel,
> > net-2.6.25.git):
>
> Well, that's annoying, you didn't mention net-2.6.25 back then, it sure
> is incompatible with it like already the patch title said... :-)

I did mention that in my first mail:

"Bits are unmodified 2.6.24-rc7 bits downloaded today (Jan 23rd)".

I tried it hoping it would not change a lot, but it didn't work
obviously :)

> ...This is either due to mismerge or due your modifications.

Again, it was due to wrong patch bits (to reiterate, I am using
unmodified bits without any modifications), but let's move ahead.
Your patch in this mail applied cleanly for me, and I am compiling
now.

- KK

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html