[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47983304.3030309@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:41:08 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [IPV4 3/5] fib_trie: dump doesnt use RCU
David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:48:47 -0800
>
>
>> Since fib dump (via netlink) holds the RTNL mutex, it is unnecessary
>> to use RCU, and it is impossible to get truncated (-EBUSY) result.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
>>
>
> You tested this patch, right? :-/
>
> The whole reason we need the nlk->cb[] state is to hold things across
> multiple recvmsg() calls that might be necessary to obtain the full
> dump.
>
> rtnetlink goes:
>
> rtnl_lock();
> netlink_rcv_skb(skb, &rtnetlink_rcv_msg);
> ...
> static int rtnetlink_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
> {
> ...
> if (kind == 2 && nlh->nlmsg_flags&NLM_F_DUMP) {
> struct sock *rtnl;
> rtnl_dumpit_func dumpit;
>
> dumpit = rtnl_get_dumpit(family, type);
> if (dumpit == NULL)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> __rtnl_unlock();
> rtnl = net->rtnl;
> err = netlink_dump_start(rtnl, skb, nlh, dumpit, NULL);
> rtnl_lock();
> return err;
>
> (NOTE: Drops RTNL semaphore for netlink_dump_start() call)
>
> ...
> int netlink_dump_start(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> int (*dump)(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct netlink_callback *),
> int (*done)(struct netlink_callback *))
> {
> ...
> cb->dump = dump;
> cb->done = done;
> cb->nlh = nlh;
> atomic_inc(&skb->users);
> cb->skb = skb;
> ...
> mutex_lock(nlk->cb_mutex);
> ...
> nlk->cb = cb;
> mutex_unlock(nlk->cb_mutex);
>
> netlink_dump(sk);
> ...
>
> static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk)
> {
> ...
> mutex_lock(nlk->cb_mutex);
> ...
> len = cb->dump(skb, cb);
>
> if (len > 0) {
> mutex_unlock(nlk->cb_mutex);
> skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
> sk->sk_data_ready(sk, len);
> return 0;
> }
>
> (NOTE: Therefore cb->dump() runs without RTNL semaphore held)
>
> ...
> static int netlink_recvmsg(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct socket *sock,
> struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> int flags)
> {
> ...
> if (nlk->cb && atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) <= sk->sk_rcvbuf / 2)
> netlink_dump(sk);
> ...
>
> Therefore, that RTNL assertion you added should have triggered on any
> dump you may have tried since ->dump() is always invoked without the
> RTNL semaphore since rtnetlink drops it around the ->dump() call and
> the call chain for this fib_trie cause would be:
>
> inet_dump_fib()
> fn_trie_dump()
>
> and nothing in that code path retakes the RTNL semaphore.
Actually we're always holding the rtnl during dumps, nlk->cb_mutex points
to rtnl_mutex in case of rtnetlink. It used to be held only during the first
->dump invocation and not on continuations, but I changed this a few
versions
ago.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists