[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080126114036.GA2624@ami.dom.local>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:40:36 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, schwab@...e.de
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9816] New: cannot replace route
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:16:01PM +0900, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> 2008/1/26, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>:
> >
> > But whatever. It used to work. People's scripts will break. Regression.
> >
>
> Also I thought that 'replace with itself' should be error as like Jarek.
> But it used to work and patch made a regression, it's my bad :(
Actually, I don't think 'replace with itself' should be an error. I've
only meant that lack of this possibility shouldn't be necessarily seen
as error - there could be arguments for both sides.
IMHO, there should be simply analyzed pros and cons of doing it in
this particular place, so: if there is any gain in doing this, and if
possible complications or problems with performance, security etc.
don't prevail such a gain.
And I don't think a regression argument should be valid at all if
there are removed any unlogical, error-prone or otherwise problematic
options (I don't know if this is such case), even if they are not
obvious bugs - especially if it's still possible to do the same
'proper' way.
Regards,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists