netdev - [GIT PULL] pull request for lblnet-2.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:09:31 -0500
From:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] pull request for lblnet-2.6_testing

Hi James,

I've just rebased the lblnet-2.6_testing tree against Linus' latest 
which already includes DaveM's net-2.6.25 tree so there shouldn't be 
any collisions with the core networking bits.  Other than minor changes 
needed to merge cleanly with the current linux-2.6 tree there have been 
no changes to the labeled networking patches since they were last 
posted.  The git tree can be found here:

 * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing

In the interest of full disclosure, I was not able to test this tree as 
there are a few compile errors in the drivers area which are preventing 
me from getting a kernel built.  However, all of the relevant areas 
(security/selinux, net/netlabel, net/netfilter, net/xfrm, net/ipv4, 
net/ipv6) compiled without issue.  I will continue to try and get a 
kernel compiled but I thought getting this out in a reasonable 
timeframe to minimize merge issues was a better decision.  Thse patches 
applied to 2.6.24 do compile, boot, and run without any known 
regressions.

-- 
paul moore
linux security @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html