| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200801291009.32056.paul.moore@hp.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:09:31 -0500 From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com> To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> Cc: selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: [GIT PULL] pull request for lblnet-2.6_testing Hi James, I've just rebased the lblnet-2.6_testing tree against Linus' latest which already includes DaveM's net-2.6.25 tree so there shouldn't be any collisions with the core networking bits. Other than minor changes needed to merge cleanly with the current linux-2.6 tree there have been no changes to the labeled networking patches since they were last posted. The git tree can be found here: * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing In the interest of full disclosure, I was not able to test this tree as there are a few compile errors in the drivers area which are preventing me from getting a kernel built. However, all of the relevant areas (security/selinux, net/netlabel, net/netfilter, net/xfrm, net/ipv4, net/ipv6) compiled without issue. I will continue to try and get a kernel compiled but I thought getting this out in a reasonable timeframe to minimize merge issues was a better decision. Thse patches applied to 2.6.24 do compile, boot, and run without any known regressions. -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists