[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080226.224555.239440389.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:45:55 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH]: TCP + SACK + skb processing latency
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:18:02 +0200 (EET)
Interesting idea... it is like a baby step towards a more efficient
write queue data management facility :-)
> I'd appreciate if somebody with more knowledge about skb internals could
> take a look at the relevant parts (mainly skb_shift) and confirm that
> doing all this I'm trying to do is allowed :-).
It looks good. You never have to worry about skb's in the write queue
having headers, ever. They only contain data.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists