[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080226.232314.130964666.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:23:14 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jarkao2@...il.com
Cc: dada1@...mosbay.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of
netif_rx()
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:20:41 +0000
> I wonder why overloading with net processing is no concern here?
> There would be no napi control around this netif_receive_skb().
Good point, but we're talking about loopback wherein only
the local system can overload itself.
> Another concern might be a code which depends on softirq context
> here (unless it was checked already)?
Hmmm.... yes this could be a problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists