[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080227073415.GB4000@ff.dom.local>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:34:15 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: dada1@...mosbay.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of
netif_rx()
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:23:14PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:20:41 +0000
>
> > I wonder why overloading with net processing is no concern here?
> > There would be no napi control around this netif_receive_skb().
>
> Good point, but we're talking about loopback wherein only
> the local system can overload itself.
Then e.g. the lack of responsiveness should concern us, I guess.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists