[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47D48BEF.2070103@tiscali.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:16:31 +0100
From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
To: Paul Gortmaker <p_gortmaker@...oo.com>
CC: jschlst@...ba.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.c: logical-bitwise or confusion?
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> --- Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl> wrote:
>
>> drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.c:3416
>>
>> tsv->svv[0] = ((tx_fstatus & 0x0100 >> 6) || IBM_PASS_SOURCE_ADDR);
>>
>> shouldn't this be a bit-wise or?
>> from drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.h:50:
>>
>> #define IBM_PASS_SOURCE_ADDR 0x01
>
> Probably a safe bet that is what they meant to have. Since
> as it stands, gcc will (correctly) optimize that into:
>
> tsv->svv[0]= 1;
>
> which probably isn't particularly useful.
>
> Paul.
That was what I was thinking as well.
---
logical-bitwise | confusion
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.c b/drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.c
index 8909050..8ae5837 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tokenring/smctr.c
@@ -3413,7 +3413,7 @@ static int smctr_make_tx_status_code(struct net_device *dev,
tsv->svi = TRANSMIT_STATUS_CODE;
tsv->svl = S_TRANSMIT_STATUS_CODE;
- tsv->svv[0] = ((tx_fstatus & 0x0100 >> 6) || IBM_PASS_SOURCE_ADDR);
+ tsv->svv[0] = ((tx_fstatus & 0x0100 >> 6) | IBM_PASS_SOURCE_ADDR);
/* Stripped frame status of Transmitted Frame */
tsv->svv[1] = tx_fstatus & 0xff;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists