lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080319.135205.125229102.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	benoit.boissinot@...-lyon.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	pekkas@...core.fi, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] [IPv6] spelling fix in /proc:
 /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/default/temp_prefered_lft

From: Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@...-lyon.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:42:27 +0100

> Is there a way to fix a bad spelling in /proc ?
> 
> Here is a patch to fix all the spelling error (prefered -> preferred)
> in the ipv6 code. I didn't change the /proc name but everything else is
> changed.
> Currently you can found both spelling in the ipv6 code.
> Is it ok ?

I think this doesn't add any value.

If the procfs file name has to remain the same, which it does,
changing variable and macro names to be different will only
cause merge conflicts and pain yet have no redeeming value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ