[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080321.155600.121386813.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] socket: SOCK_DEBUG type checking
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:51:32 -0700
> Use the inline trick (same as pr_debug) to get checking
> of debug statements even if no code is generated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Applied, and I'll push to net-2.6.26 after some build
testing.
Although the use of SOCK_DEBUG is so esoteric and sparse,
I can't see how any of it can be useful for any kind of
debugging.
I'd say we should just remove this thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists