netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two more pasemi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:22:04 -0500
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, pasemi-linux@...abs.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two more pasemi_mac patches for 2.6.26

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:12:30AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> The below two patches go on top of the previous patches that were acked
>> by you but applied to pasemi.git for feed up through powerpc.git.
>>
>> One is a couple of fixes for various corner cases in the jumbo support
>> configuration. The second is addition of netpoll support, from Nate
>> Case.
>>
>> Review/ack would be appreciated, I'll feed them up the same path as the
>> other changes.
>
> ACK 1-2, though I would consider closely patch #2, whether you need 
> disable_irq() or spin_lock_irqsave() -- which is best for your specific 
> driver + platform?

I'm tempted to leave the disable/enable_irq() in there. It's certainly
heavier than doing cpu-side irq masking, but adding a spinlock to the
common interrupt path seems worse to me. I didn't think we considered
the polling to be a hot path anyway...


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html