netdev - Re: [PATCH 1 of 5] IPv6: do not wrap around when the lifetime has expired

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:38:54 +0100
From:	Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@...-lyon.org>
To:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, pekkas@...core.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 5] IPv6: do not wrap around when the lifetime has
	expired

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:25:39AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <dd125a7f86968371046d.1206305169@...zuine> (at Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:46:09 +0100), Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@...-lyon.org> says:
> 
> > IPv6: do not wrap around when the lifetime has expired
> > 
> > Instead of reporting overly large lifetimes to userspace,
> > report a lifetime of 0 when a lifetime has expired.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@...-lyon.org>
> 
> NAK.
> 
> (signed) lifetime < 0 means it has expired, but 0 does not mean
> that the lifetime has expired, but it is being expired
> (within 1 second).

It makes sense, so is the output of ip addr correct ?

inet6 2a01:5d8:58a0:ebfc:b5fb:88a3:27a5:ce96/64 scope global secondary deprecated dynamic
   valid_lft 84064sec preferred_lft 4294964960sec

Can iproute2 be "fixed" ? or is it the expected output ?

thanks,

Benoit

-- 
:wq
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html