netdev - Re: Adding IPv6 support to IPVS: some general questions about kernel development

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:29:30 +0200
From:	"Julius Volz" <juliusv@...gle.com>
To:	"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Simon Horman" <horms@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: Adding IPv6 support to IPVS: some general questions about kernel development

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote:
>  net/ipvs or net/netfilter/ipvs sound fine. The second is probably
>  better since at some point we should try to merge the duplicated
>  conntrack functionality if possible.

Sure, since IPVS is basically a netfilter extension, that sounds good
to me. Could all the IPv4- and IPv6-specific functionality (as opposed
to the commonly used code) also end up in there or would that still
have to reside under ipv[4,6]/...?

Does it seem wise to do this move as the first thing in this process?
That would probably be a good starter exercise to get to know the
whole process!

Thanks so much for helping!

Kind Regards,
Julius

-- 
Google Switzerland GmbH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html