netdev - Re: Adding IPv6 support to IPVS: some general questions about kernel development

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080401052003.GC21127@verge.net.au>
Date:	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:20:05 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Julius Volz <juliusv@...gle.com>
Cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding IPv6 support to IPVS: some general questions about
	kernel development

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:29:30PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote:
> >  net/ipvs or net/netfilter/ipvs sound fine. The second is probably
> >  better since at some point we should try to merge the duplicated
> >  conntrack functionality if possible.
> 
> Sure, since IPVS is basically a netfilter extension, that sounds good
> to me. Could all the IPv4- and IPv6-specific functionality (as opposed
> to the commonly used code) also end up in there or would that still
> have to reside under ipv[4,6]/...?
> 
> Does it seem wise to do this move as the first thing in this process?
> That would probably be a good starter exercise to get to know the
> whole process!

I think that sounds like an excellent idea. net/netfilter/ipvs sounds
fine to me, though think that IPVS is fairly loosely tied to nefilter,
so if it was only up to me I would go for net/ipvs.

-- 
Horms

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html