[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F4EB73.1040705@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:36:35 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Marco Berizzi <pupilla@...mail.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Kazunori MIYAZAWA <kazunori@...azawa.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8 regression with openswan
Marco Berizzi wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> Manually adding SAs works fine for me, can you figure out what
>> kind of SA openswan was trying to add?
>
> I have sent you the output of ip -s x s
> and ip -s x p when openswan is working with
> 2.6.25-rc8 with the commit df9dcb458 reverted.
> Let me know you need ssh access to my 2.6.25
> box.
The problem appears to be that openswan doesn't initialize the
selectors family when adding new SAs. xfrm_init_state() uses
the family to decide whether to set up inter family SAs or
regular SAs. We used to fix up the family in xfrm_user, but
this is now only done for transport mode SAs.
- /*
- * Set inner address family if the KM left it as zero.
- * See comment in validate_tmpl.
- */
- if (!x->sel.family)
+ if (x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT)
x->sel.family = p->family;
+
Reverting this part should fix it, but would break inter family
tunnels again. It seems we need a different indication for
xfrm_init_state() for inter family SAs.
Kazunori, any ideas?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists