netdev - Re: [PATCH] Stochastic Fair Blue queue discipline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47FAB688.7010807@trash.net>
Date:	Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:04:24 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@....jussieu.fr>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stochastic Fair Blue queue discipline

Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The attached is an implementation of the Stochastic Fair Blue queue
> discipline for Linux.
>
> I would like to request a review of the following code, and whether it
> is worthwile to add the Kconfig bits and submit it for inclusion into
> the mainline kernel.
>
> You will find a ready to build tarball on
>
>   http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/sch_sfb-20080407.tar.gz
>   http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/sch_sfb-20080407.tar.gz.asc
>
> and a short description on
>
>   http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/sfb/

Do you have some graphs or something showing the effects?
I experienced with SFB myself some time ago and recall
getting huge unfairness towards non-ECN connections.
I can't remember exactly how good it behaved overall.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html