netdev - Re: [PATCH] Stochastic Fair Blue queue discipline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47FAC2D1.6010909@trash.net>
Date:	Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:56:49 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@....jussieu.fr>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stochastic Fair Blue queue discipline

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The attached is an implementation of the Stochastic Fair Blue queue
>> discipline for Linux.
>>
>> I would like to request a review of the following code, and whether it
>> is worthwile to add the Kconfig bits and submit it for inclusion into
>> the mainline kernel.
>>
>> You will find a ready to build tarball on
>>
>>   http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/sch_sfb-20080407.tar.gz
>>   
>> http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/sch_sfb-20080407.tar.gz.asc 
>>
>>
>> and a short description on
>>
>>   http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/sfb/
>
> Do you have some graphs or something showing the effects?
> I experienced with SFB myself some time ago and recall
> getting huge unfairness towards non-ECN connections.
> I can't remember exactly how good it behaved overall.

I just found my old tree and it was just Blue, which might explain
this :) Thanks for posting this, I'll have a closer look at your
patch tommorrow.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html