| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:06:57 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> To: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:48:37AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:13:36AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >>> - get rid of `model = "UCC"' in the ucc nodes > >>> It isn't used anywhere, so remove it. If we'll ever need something > >>> like this, we'll use compatible property instead. > >>> - replace cell-index and device-id properties by fsl,ucc. > >>> > >>> Drivers are modified for backward compatibility's sake. > >> I'd prefer we use cell-index and not introduce "fsl,ucc". I'm ok with > >> dropping device-id and model (its implied in the compatiable). > > > > Ok. Here it is. netdev and linux-serial Cc'ed. > > Do we want the first UCC to have a cell-index of 1? Maybe we should fix this > off-by-one error once and for all, and number all UCCs from 0? Isn't documentation numbers UCC from 1? Then I believe we should stick with it for device tree, since off by one is Linux implementation details. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@...il.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists