netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47FF9B01.7010207@freescale.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:08:17 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	avorontsov@...mvista.com
CC:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup

Anton Vorontsov wrote:

>> Do we want the first UCC to have a cell-index of 1?  Maybe we should fix this
>> off-by-one error once and for all, and number all UCCs from 0?
> 
> Isn't documentation numbers UCC from 1? 

Yes.

> Then I believe we should stick
> with it for device tree, since off by one is Linux implementation details.

Fair enough.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html