| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080411173100.GA20439@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:31:00 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> To: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:21:06PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > > > Or maybe I'm thinking here in terms of "fsl,ucc"... and cell-index is > > > indeed should be -1... don't know. Please decide. ;-) > > > > Well, that's what I was thinking. cell-index is zero-based, so UCC1 should have > > cell-index = <0>. > > > > Of course, this means all the code needs to change, since I think device-id is > > one-based. > > Yup. You raised a really good question, because we're _introducing_ > cell-index for UCC nodes, and if we'll choice wrong numbering scheme > now, then there will be no way back w/o breaking backward compatibility. Hm... thinking about it more, we're introducing implementation for the cell-index, but device tree was "infected" already. So, too late. :-D -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@...il.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists