[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804111916590.3759@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:35:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ATM cell alignment.
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> @@ -87,6 +111,16 @@ int tc_calc_rtable(struct tc_ratespec *r, __u32
>> *rtab, int cell_log, unsigned mt
>> unsigned sz = ((i+1)<<cell_log);
>> if (sz < mpu)
>> sz = mpu;
>> + switch (linklayer) {
>> + case LINKLAYER_ATM:
>> + sz = tc_align_to_atm(sz);
>> + break;
>> + case LINKLAYER_ETHERNET:
>> + // No size adjustments on Ethernet
>> + break;
>
> Couldn't this use the ARPHRD values?
It would make it more difficult to expand to new linklayer types. For
example I cannot find a define suitable for DOCSIS (cabel modems) (Thats
next om my list to make DaveM happy ;-))
If we need to use the ARPHRD values (ARPHRD_ATM + ARPHDR_ETHER), I'm
wondering which "if_arp.h" is the correct to include.
#include <linux/if_arp.h>
or
#include <net/if_arp.h>
Hilsen
Jesper Brouer
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MSc. Master of Computer Science
Dept. of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen
Author of http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists