netdev - RE: RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <001b01c89f21$e41ecca0$6b5ee183@D2GT6T71>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:55:24 -0500
From:	Wenji Wu <wenji@...l.gov>
To:	'John Heffner' <johnwheffner@...il.com>
Cc:	'Ilpo Järvinen' <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
	'Netdev' <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question



>We can see that in both cases you are getting throttled by
>tcp_moderate_cwnd (X_OtherReductionsCM).  I'm not sure offhand why
>it's reaching this code - I would have thought that the high
>tp->reordering would prevent this.  Ilpo, do you have any insights?

>It's not all that surprising that packets_in_flight is a higher value
>with newreno than sack, which would explain the higher window with
>newreno.

>Wenji, the web100 kernel has a sysctl - WAD_MaxBurst.  I suspect it
>may make a significant difference if you set this to a large value.

It is surprising! When I increase WAD_MaxBurst (Patched with Web100) from 3
to 20, the throughput in both cases (SACK ON/OFF) will saturate the 1Gbps
Link!!!


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html