[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080424.083908.147395158.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, drepper@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > Given we will never have 2^32 socket types, and in a sense this is part
> > of the type why not just use
> >
> > socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, ...)
>
> Ok, I have to admit that I find this very appealing. It looks much
> cleaner, but perhaps more importantly, it also looks both readable _and_
> easier to use for the user-space programmer.
Me too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists