netdev - Re: [PATCH] asm/unaligned.h doesn't work well as the very first include

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1209277888.14173.45.camel@brick>
Date:	Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:31:28 -0700
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm/unaligned.h doesn't work well as the very first
	include

On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 07:12 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 08:09:44AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> 
> > It has been discussed that any .h file should pull
> > in what it needs so the other of includes does not matter.
> > Some do them alphabetically.
> 
> It has been discussed or it has been agreed?  IMO it's a bullshit - especially
> for low-level stuff like that.
> 
> As for the way some do includes...  It's not exactly a family-friendly list,
> but still I'd rather not comment in details on the existing practices...

I'm redoing the unaligned handling in -mm at the moment, and it avoids
this problem.

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html