[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804302208.56925.bpidoux@free.fr>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:08:56 +0200
From: Bernard Pidoux <bpidoux@...e.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hams" <linux-hams@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Wrong list_lock argument in rose_node seqops
In rose_node_start() as well as in rose_node_stop()
__acquires() and spin_lock_bh() were wrongly passing
rose_neigh_list_lock instead of rose_node_list_lock arguments.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@...at.org>
---
net/rose/rose_route.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c
index 5053a53..bd59387 100644
--- a/net/rose/rose_route.c
+++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c
@@ -1066,12 +1066,12 @@ out:
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
static void *rose_node_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
- __acquires(rose_neigh_list_lock)
+ __acquires(rose_node_list_lock)
{
struct rose_node *rose_node;
int i = 1;
- spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
if (*pos == 0)
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
@@ -1090,9 +1090,9 @@ static void *rose_node_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
}
static void rose_node_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
- __releases(rose_neigh_list_lock)
+ __releases(rose_node_list_lock)
{
- spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
}
static int rose_node_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
--
1.5.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists