[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080501.025137.95203112.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 02:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: kmansley@...arflare.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Disable forwarding of LRO skbs
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:51:26 +0100
> Add skb_warn_if_lro() to test whether an skb was received with LRO and
> warn if so.
>
> Change br_forward(), ip_forward() and ip6_forward() to call
> skb_warn_if_lro() and discard the skb if it returns true.
This skb_is_gso() test should be inline.
So, instead make this something like:
include/linux/skbuff.h:
extern bool __skb_warn_if_lro(const struct sk_buff *skb);
static inline bool skb_warn_if_lro(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (unlikely(skb_is_gso(skb)))
return __skb_warn_if_lro(skb);
return false;
}
net/core/skbuff.c:
bool skb_warn_if_lro(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (net_ratelimit())
pr_warning("%s: received packets cannot be forwarded"
" while LRO is enabled\n", skb->dev->name);
return true;
}
Can you make this correction and resubmit this patch?
The second one looks fine to me, you don't need to resubmit
that one.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists