[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080506.191848.37229806.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 19:18:48 +0900 (JST)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: miika@....fi
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [NET] Exporting of some IPv6 symbols for HIP and SHIM6
experimentation
In article <Pine.SOL.4.64.0805061052470.28110@...konen.cs.hut.fi> (at Tue, 6 May 2008 11:07:49 +0300 (EEST)), Miika Komu <miika@....fi> says:
> > Miika, where are your other patches on top of this?
> > This kind of change might be okay, but it must be along with
> > its users, at least.
>
> we are maintaining a separate kernel module (GPLv2) for the HIP socket
> handler for experimentation purposes. If you want to have a look it, you
> can e.g. download the nightly tarball and have a look at the hipsock
> directory:
>
> http://infrahip.hiit.fi/hipl/hipl.tar.gz
Even though, we basically do not accept patches without in-kernel users.
Anyway, I've quickly looked into the code, and IMHO
it is better to avoid using hip_select_socket_handler() and
to introduce new hip_ops (or something) in sock{}.
And, are you working on IPv4 transport?
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists