[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482B0DF8.9060001@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 09:06:16 -0700
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
R?mi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@...phalempin.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dccp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK_DGRAM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit Renker wrote:
> ... but it would still be good to have.
> [...]
Thanks, but I think I got this already from previous mails.
The question is: is either DCCP or UDPlite important enough to be
returned in the default list when socktype and protocol are zero?
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIKw342ijCOnn/RHQRAmnrAKCO0sevJbyZXNoFG12jSg1NjPC+5wCfUlyH
cLqvVRQ1gmTkkwl5JnqA9go=
=QRU/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists