lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 14 May 2008 18:22:04 +0100
From:	Gerrit Renker <>
To:	Ulrich Drepper <>
Cc:	R?mi Denis-Courmont <>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <>,
	David Stevens <>,
	David Miller <>,,
Subject: Re: [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK_DGRAM

| The question is: is either DCCP or UDPlite important enough to be
| returned in the default list when socktype and protocol are zero?
They are probably both not important enough to be returned in the
default list.

But either is important be considered when a user unambiguously specifies
ai_socktype and/or ai_protocol; to avoid bad/brittle workarounds.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists