[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1210786780.31221.8.camel@w-sridhar2.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 10:39:40 -0700
From: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Cc: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>,
R?mi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@...phalempin.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dccp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK_DGRAM
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 09:06 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gerrit Renker wrote:
> > ... but it would still be good to have.
> > [...]
>
> Thanks, but I think I got this already from previous mails.
SCTP is another protocol that needs to be supported in getaddrinfo().
The minimum support that is good to have is to handle the following
values of ai_socktype and ai_protocol.
SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_SCTP
SOCK_SEQPACKET, IPPROTO_SCTP
Thanks
Sridhar
>
> The question is: is either DCCP or UDPlite important enough to be
> returned in the default list when socktype and protocol are zero?
>
> - --
> ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIKw342ijCOnn/RHQRAmnrAKCO0sevJbyZXNoFG12jSg1NjPC+5wCfUlyH
> cLqvVRQ1gmTkkwl5JnqA9go=
> =QRU/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists