| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:34:11 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] IPV6: remove addresses and routes when carrier is lost On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:53:08 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: > From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:46:40 -0700 > > > It is not what desktop users want, that is why it is a dynamic configuration > > option via /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/ethX/link_detect. > > > > But it is what a router wants. So why not allow it? Obviously, Vyatta > > users expect systems behave same as Cisco. > > > > The problem with doing it all in user space are not impossible just more difficult: > > * links bouncing lead to synchronization problems > > * existing Quagga code avoids messing with "system routes" > > * Quagga has to be portable to Solaris/BSD etc.. > > > > More at: > > http://osdir.com/ml/network.quagga.devel/2004-08/msg00009.html > > If it's a route behavioral attribute, make it as such and add > a new rtnetlink route attribute. If it's not there, existing > behavior is maintained. > How would this work for system generated routes which occur when address is added to interface? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists