[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <484542B5.4070401@trash.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:10:13 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>
CC: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix routing tables with id > 255 for legacy software
Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> Well, if people already use table 253, I guess they might care.
>
> Not really as if pople use a FRA_TABLE aware application they should not
> notice any difference.
In that case not of course.
>> I'm not convinced this is any better than overflowing.
>
> But if they use FRA_TABLE unaware application than overflowing means
> mismatching all:
> - N*256 table as RT_TABLE_UNSPEC
> - N*256+253 tables as RT_TABLE_DEFAULT
> - N*256+254 tables as RT_TABLE_MAIN
> - N*256+255 tables as RT_TABLE_LOCAL
>
> And as I just find out, when it happens is quite unexpected and can
> really hurt. :(
>
>> And I still don't see any other way to handle this properly.
>
> Exactly. So that's why I came with above solution, similar to AS_TRANSIT
> idea used in BGP to handle 16bit -> 32bit ASN transformation.
I think the proper solution is what I wrote in the changelog
entry: fix userspace applications when using extended table
IDs.
Your patch makes it more predictable, so I'm not completely
opposed, but still its just a workaround.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists