[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <485566B6.4030206@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:00:06 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
CC: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 00:04 +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
>> driver source code will goto drivers directory and firmware will goto
>> firmware directory.
>> Please let us know, how can we keep them in same directory.
>
> Realistically speaking, we can't.
Of course you can. That's where we keep binary firmwares now -- with
the drivers.
And, shockingly enough, it makes maintenance nice and easy to keep
everything in one location.
> Although we'll preserve the option to
> build firmware blobs into the kernel image, the primary means of using
> them should be running 'make firmware_install' and having them put
> into /lib/firmware. It's better for them to be in the firmware/
> directory.
You have not built any logical connection with this statement.
Kernel modules are installed via 'make modules_install', and we don't
have any special directory requirements for that.
There is absolutely no reason why 'make firmware_install' cannot work on
firmwares in existing directories.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists