netdev - Re: [PATCH net-2.6 5/7] atm: [br2864] fix routed vcmux support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080616.172012.03949802.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	chas@....nrl.navy.mil
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6 5/7] atm: [br2864] fix routed vcmux support

From: "chas williams - CONTRACTOR" <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:27:41 -0400

>     atm: [br2864] fix routed vcmux support
>     
>     From: Eric Kinzie <ekinzie@....nrl.navy.mil>
>     Signed-off-by: Chas Williams <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>

Applied.

But please provide more detailed commit messages, this one leaves a
lot to be desired.

What was broken about vcmux support and what was the top-level scheme
used to fix that problem?

Not many people other than the author of the patch knows the answer to
those questions because this commit message is opaque.  If someone
has to come across this commit to try and diagnose something, they
will be pretty lost as to what was the intent here.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html