netdev - Re: Killing sk->sk_callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48573DCC.2020406@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:30:04 -0400
From:	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	Patrick Mullaney <PMullaney@...ell.com>,
	chuck.lever@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Killing sk->sk_callback_lock

Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:09 AM, in message
>>>>         
> <20080616.210923.91199695.davem@...emloft.net>, David Miller
> <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: 
>   
>> From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
>> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:01:13 -0600
>>
>>     
>>> Please bear with us.  It is not our intent to be annoying, but we are 
>>>       
>> perhaps doing a poor job of describing the actual nature of the issue we are 
>> seeing.
>>
>> Even though you says so, I don't believe your email system locks you
>> into these extremely long poorly formatted lines.  I get properly
>> formatted plain text emails from other Novell employees, and they
>> don't have long lines.
>>
>> Your emails are extremely painful for me, and other developers, to
>> read.  And you can expect an extremely degraded level of response, or
>> none at all, when you format your emails in this way.
>>     
>
> Understood and apologize.  I use the Linux Groupwise client which apparently does not get the same level of features as the other platforms we have (e.g. Windows).  Ive complained to the helpdesk and the answer I get is that unwrapped is the official standard and wrapping is supposed to be handled by the recipients mail-viewer.  Go figure.  I can set wrapping on all my other clients, but I cant find it anywhere on this one.  I'm sorry for the difficulties this causes. 
>
> Ive CC'd my personal address and will respond in the future with that client (which I know supports it properly).
>
>   
>> Just FYI...
>>     
>
>
>
>
>   

For what its worth, my thunderbird client here at home seems to render 
my non-wrapped email just fine.  What client are you using, out of 
curiosity?

-Greg


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (251 bytes)